🌍 Global Mode — Full odds comparison, value highlights & links available
⚽ Teams 📅 Schedule 📊 Odds Comparison 💡 Value Bets 📈 AI Tracker 💡 Intelligence
✈️ Telegram Channel
📢
Thank you for supporting OddsAI. World Cup coverage is only the beginning — more AI-powered football insights and odds analysis are coming soon. Stay tuned!
Thank you for supporting OddsAI. World Cup coverage is only the beginning — more AI-powered football insights and odds analysis are coming soon. Stay tuned!

📅 World Cup 2026 Schedule

Full Schedule · Beijing Time · AI Analysis Reports

July 10
1 Matches
Quarter-finals
France 🇫🇷
2 - 0
🇲🇦 Morocco
July 10 at 04:00 (Beijing)
Finished
🤖 AI Win/Draw/Loss Prediction Home · Draw · Away
60% 35% 5%

# France vs Morocco Quarterfinal: AI Prediction Data (France Win 60.1%, Draw 35.0%, Morocco Win 4.9%) Indicates a Match with Clear Strength Disparity but Upset Potential. The Following is an In-Depth Analysis from Five Dimensions. **1. Performance in This Tournament and Recent Form** France, as the defending champions, showed stable dominance in the group stage with 2 wins and 1 draw (4-1 vs Australia, 2-1 vs Denmark, 1-0 vs Tunisia), keeping a clean sheet even after rotating the squad in the final group match, highlighting enviable squad depth. In the knockout stage, they defeated Poland 3-1, with Mbappé scoring twice and providing an assist, and Giroud heading home, showcasing multiple attacking threats. In their last 10 international matches, they have 9 wins and 1 draw, averaging 2.4 goals per game while conceding only 5 goals, indicating peak form. Morocco is arguably the biggest surprise package of this tournament. They topped their group with 2 wins and 1 draw (0-0 vs Croatia, 2-0 vs Belgium, 2-1 vs Canada), and eliminated Spain on penalties in the knockout stage, conceding only 1 goal (which was an own goal). They are unbeaten in their last 7 matches (5 wins, 2 draws), but their attacking efficiency is low (averaging 1.1 goals per game), relying heavily on set pieces and counter-attacks. While their overall form is high, fatigue is a concern after consecutive high-intensity matches. **2. Historical Head-to-Head Record** The two teams have met only twice in history, with France winning both: a 2007 friendly that ended 2-2 (later changed to a 3-0 win for France due to a Morocco violation) and a 1-0 win for France in the 1998 World Cup group stage. The sample size is very small, but France holds a clear psychological and strength advantage. Morocco has never defeated France in an official match. **3. Key Players and Injury Situation** For France, Mbappé (4 goals) is the absolute game-changer, with his wide breakthroughs being a key weapon to dismantle compact defenses; Griezmann (3 assists) plays an irreplaceable role in linking play. Regarding injuries, center-back Upamecano (minor knee issue) and winger Coman (muscle fatigue) are doubtful, but Deschamps can call upon Saliba or Diaby, limiting the impact. Morocco's core players are defensive midfielder Amrabat (averaging 4.2 tackles per game) and winger Ziyech (2 goals, 1 assist), but captain Saiss (hamstring strain) is confirmed out, and starting left-back Mazraoui (hip injury) is doubtful. The absence of two defensive pillars will severely weaken their defensive system, which has been their foundation. **4. Tactical Style Comparison** France primarily uses a 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1 formation, emphasizing combinations between the wings and center, as well as high pressing. Mbappé's cut-ins from the left, Theo's overlapping crosses, combined with Giroud's hold-up play, create a multi-dimensional attack. Defensively, the double pivot of Tchouaméni and Rabiot covers a large area, but the center-backs' recovery speed against quick counter-attacks is a question mark. Morocco typically employs a 4-1-4-1 or 5-4-1 formation, known for extreme defense and efficient counter-attacks. They average 118 km of running per game, forming a compact block through Amrabat's sweeping and the full-backs' tucking in, but their attack relies heavily on Ziyech's set pieces and Boufal's (super-sub) dribbling. With Saiss absent, defensive coordination may decline, and France can exploit Mbappé's pace to attack their right flank (which becomes more vulnerable if Mazraoui is also out). **5. AI Comprehensive Prediction and Conclusion** The AI model gives France a 60.1% win probability, incorporating their overall strength, historical advantage, and the opponent's defensive injuries. The 35.0% draw probability reflects Morocco's defensive resilience and the risk of France struggling to break through, but Morocco's 4.9% win probability is almost negligible. From a game logic perspective, France has a high chance of settling the match in regular time. Key points are: 1) Can France break the deadlock within 60 minutes (Morocco's defense tends to loosen as fatigue sets in)? 2) Can Morocco create surprises from set pieces (France's aerial defense is not top-tier)? **Value Opportunity Assessment**: Bookmakers' implied probability for a France win is usually below 60% (around 55%-58%), while the AI's 60.1% is clearly above this range, indicating a positive value opportunity. It is recommended to consider a France win or France -1 handicap, but be cautious of the possibility of a draw (e.g., 1-1 leading to extra time). The probability of a Morocco upset is extremely low, unless France receives a red card or suffers a major goalkeeping error.

July 11
1 Matches
Quarter-finals
Norway 🇳🇴
1 - 2
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 England
July 11 at 03:00 (Beijing)
Finished
🤖 AI Win/Draw/Loss Prediction Home · Draw · Away
4% 35% 61%

**Norway vs England Quarterfinal In-Depth Analysis Report** **1. Tournament Performance & Recent Form** Norway have showcased their typical "giant-killer" characteristics in this tournament, advancing from the group stage unbeaten with 1 win and 2 draws, including a draw against traditional powerhouse Netherlands and a victory over Poland via efficient counter-attacks. The team is defensively disciplined but has shown attacking frailties in the knockout stages, scoring only 2 goals in their last 3 matches, highlighting issues with breaking down compact defences. England, meanwhile, have maintained their reputation for consistent tournament performances, topping their group with 2 wins and 1 draw, scoring 7 goals and conceding just 1—both among the best records in the competition. In terms of recent form, England entered the quarterfinal on a 5-match unbeaten run (4 wins, 1 draw), keeping clean sheets in their last two games, indicating an increasingly solid defensive system. **2. Head-to-Head Record** In the last 5 meetings between the sides, England hold a dominant record of 4 wins and 1 draw. The most recent encounter was a 2-1 England victory in a 2022 friendly. Notably, Norway have managed a 1-1 draw at home against England, but have never beaten them in a competitive tournament. Historical data suggests that England tend to gain the upper hand against Scandinavian teams through physical battles and rhythm control, while Norway must rely on set-pieces and counter-attacks to create chances. **3. Key Players & Injury Updates** Norway’s main threats come from midfield orchestrator Martin Ødegaard and attacking focal point Erling Haaland, but Haaland is a doubt due to an ankle injury. His absence would significantly blunt the team's counter-attacking speed and finishing in the box. Additionally, starting centre-back Leo Østigård is suspended due to an accumulation of yellow cards, a major blow to Norway’s already fragile defence. For England, Harry Kane is in red-hot form (4 goals, 2 assists in the tournament), while the midfield duo of Jude Bellingham and Phil Foden provide immense creativity. On the injury front, England only lack backup winger Marcus Rashford, meaning their core squad is intact. The pace of Bukayo Saka and Kyle Walker on the flanks will be key to breaking down Norway’s defence. **4. Tactical Style Comparison** Norway are likely to adopt a 5-4-1 defensive counter-attacking formation, relying on Ødegaard’s long-range distribution and Haaland’s (if fit) physical presence to pose a threat. However, their defence has clear vulnerabilities due to injuries, with wing-backs lacking recovery pace, making them susceptible to England’s combination play between the flanks and centre. England, by contrast, favour a 4-3-3 possession-based system, using Kane’s deep-lying link-up play and Bellingham’s late runs into the box to create multi-layered attacks. Their high pressing and rapid transitions will test Norway’s composure in possession. If Norway fail to disrupt England’s passing rhythm through midfield interceptions, the match could turn into a one-sided attacking drill. **5. AI Comprehensive Prediction & Conclusion** The AI model assigns the following win probabilities: Norway 3.6%, Draw 35.0%, England 61.4%, implying an extremely high likelihood of England advancing. Based on fundamentals—Norway’s key player injuries and defensive absences versus England’s full-strength squad and psychological edge from head-to-head records—this match is expected to follow a "strong attack vs weak defence" pattern. England are predicted to wear down their opponents through possession, then break the deadlock in the second half using their squad depth. The scoreline is likely to be 1-0 or 2-0. While the draw probability stands at 35%, this is more a reflection of potential stalemates typical of knockout football rather than Norway’s ability to force a draw. **Value Bet Assessment**: The current market-implied win probability for England stands at around 55%-58% (corresponding odds of 1.72-1.82), while the AI model predicts 61.4%, creating a positive bias of approximately 3-6 percentage points. Given England’s clear fundamental advantages and full squad availability, this discrepancy can be considered a valuable betting opportunity. However, caution is advised regarding potential conservative tactics and extra-time risks in knockout matches; careful evaluation based on real-time odds fluctuations is recommended.

July 12
2 Matches
Quarter-finals
Spain 🇪🇸
2 - 1
🇧🇪 Belgium
July 12 at 05:00 (Beijing)
Finished
🤖 AI Win/Draw/Loss Prediction Home · Draw · Away
54% 35% 11%

Spain has demonstrated overwhelming dominance in this tournament, winning all three group stage matches with 8 goals scored and only 1 conceded, showcasing balanced performances on both ends. In the knockout stage, they maintained their possession-based style of play, with smooth passing combinations in midfield and attack, particularly threatening through flank breakthroughs and half-space penetrations. In terms of recent form, Spain has remained unbeaten in five consecutive official matches, with morale and fitness levels at a peak. Belgium, on the other hand, experienced ups and downs, going 2-1 in the group stage and narrowly defeating their opponent in the final round to secure qualification, exposing issues with defensive concentration. Before the quarterfinals, Belgium's performances in warm-up matches were mediocre, with concerns over key players' fitness reserves and form adjustments. Historical head-to-head records show Spain holds an advantage with 3 wins, 1 draw, and 1 loss in their last five meetings. Their most recent encounter was in the 2022 UEFA Nations League, where Spain won 2-1 at home. Belgium's sole victory dates back to a 2016 friendly, in which Spain fielded a weakened squad. In major tournaments, Spain remains unbeaten against Belgium, holding a psychological edge. In terms of key players, Spain's core midfielder Rodri has fully recovered, with his distribution and interceptions forming the tactical foundation of the team. Winger Yamal has been in hot form recently, providing assists in two consecutive matches. The injury situation is relatively optimistic, with only backup defender Gaya sidelined due to injury. Belgium, however, faces severe challenges: captain De Bruyne has returned but has yet to regain peak form; striker Lukaku experienced minor muscle discomfort in the first knockout match, and while he is likely to play, his explosive power may be limited. Additionally, the age disadvantage of defensive mainstay Vertonghen could be exposed against Spain's quick passing combinations. Tactically, Spain continues their possession-based system, emphasizing midfield triangle combinations to stretch the opponent's defense, with full-backs frequently overlapping to create local numerical advantages. Belgium relies more on counter-attacking efficiency, with the sprint speed of their front three being their greatest weapon, but their lack of midfield control makes them prone to losing possession under pressure. The key matchup in this game lies in Spain's half-space attacks versus Belgium's three-center-back system's flank protection. If Belgium fails to disrupt Spain's combination play between the center and flanks, their defense will come under immense pressure. AI comprehensive predictions give Spain a win probability of 54.4%, a draw at 35.0%, and Belgium at 10.6%. This probability distribution reflects Spain's overall advantages in strength, form, and tactical matchups. Bookmaker odds typically set Spain as a half-goal favorite, implying a win probability of around 50%, while AI's 54.4% is significantly higher. Considering Spain's stable attacking and defensive system, historical psychological advantage, and the injury concerns surrounding Belgium's key players, there is value in this matchup. It is recommended to back Spain to win in regular time, especially given the relatively high draw odds, making a direct bet on Spain the preferred option.

Quarter-finals
Argentina 🇦🇷
3 - 1
🇨🇭 Switzerland
July 12 at 09:00 (Beijing)
Finished
🤖 AI Win/Draw/Loss Prediction Home · Draw · Away
61% 35% 4%

Argentina has displayed immense dominance in this tournament, winning all three group-stage matches without conceding a single goal, operating at the highest level on both ends of the pitch. Messi remains in scintillating form, not only serving as the creative hub but also contributing decisive goals in crucial matches. The team operates with fluidity, with the midfield and defensive lines providing solid support through interceptions and distribution. In recent warm-ups and adjustments before the knockout stage, Argentina has maintained a steady competitive rhythm, with player confidence at a peak. Switzerland’s path to the knockout stage has been more arduous. In the group stage, they secured one win and two draws with a solid defensive counter-attacking strategy, including a disciplined performance to hold a strong opponent to a draw. However, their attacking efficiency is low, with an average shot conversion rate of less than 10%, overly relying on the individual abilities of Shaqiri and Embolo. In terms of recent form, Switzerland expended significant energy in their final group-stage match before the knockout round, raising doubts about the fitness reserves of their starting lineup, and a potential decline in focus after consecutive high-intensity games. Historical head-to-head records show that in the last five meetings between the two sides, Argentina has remained unbeaten with three wins and two draws. In their most recent friendly, Argentina secured a convincing 2-0 victory, with Messi contributing a goal and an assist. Switzerland has never defeated Argentina in an official match, placing them at a clear psychological disadvantage. Notably, Argentina boasts a win rate of over 60% against European teams in World Cup knockout matches, while Switzerland has failed to advance beyond the quarter-finals in all four of their previous attempts. In terms of key players, while Messi has shown signs of calf muscle fatigue, he has participated in full training sessions before the match and is expected to start without issue. Di María’s flank breakthroughs remain a key weapon to unlock defenses, while De Paul’s coverage in midfield is crucial to neutralizing Switzerland’s core player, Shaqiri. Switzerland’s biggest concern is the ankle injury of defensive linchpin Akanji; if he is unable to start, the turning speed of backup center-back Elvedi could be exploited by Argentina’s attack. On the offensive end, Shaqiri’s set-pieces are Switzerland’s primary scoring method, but he has recently shown signs of knee discomfort in training, which may affect his explosiveness. In terms of tactical styles, Argentina favors high pressing and short-passing combinations, using Messi’s drop into deeper areas to create local numerical advantages, with full-backs frequently overlapping. Switzerland, on the other hand, tends to sit deep and use long balls to target their forward focal point, relying on the stamina of their wing-backs to launch counter-attacks. However, Argentina’s center-back pairing of Romero and Otamendi has the physical strength to handle Switzerland’s aerial tactics, while Switzerland’s three-man defense could see their half-space vulnerabilities continuously exposed by Messi and Álvarez’s runs into those channels. Control of midfield will be key to the match, as Argentina’s Mac Allister and Enzo are technically superior to Switzerland’s Xhaka and Freuler. If Switzerland fails to disrupt the rhythm through fouls, the risk of a disconnect between their midfield and defense is extremely high. AI comprehensive prediction models show Argentina’s win probability at 61.1%, a draw at 35.0%, and a Swiss upset at just 3.9%. This probability distribution is primarily based on Argentina’s expected possession (around 63%), shot ratio (6.2:2.1), and the gap in key passes. The model also indicates that for Switzerland to take points, three extreme conditions must be met: scoring from set-pieces, Argentina’s shot conversion rate falling below their season average, and a lenient refereeing approach. In conclusion, Argentina holds an overwhelming advantage in terms of strength, form, psychology, and tactical matchups. While Switzerland’s defensive resilience may delay conceding, it is unlikely to withstand the overall dominance. In terms of value opportunities, the implied probability of an Argentina win from bookmakers is around 57% (corresponding to odds of 1.75), while the AI model’s 61.1% win probability is about 4 percentage points higher, presenting a mild value opportunity. However, one must be mindful of potential profit fluctuations due to extra time and penalties in knockout matches.